America First Foreign Policy

Defend America, Not Endless War

America’s foreign policy should be grounded in one principle: protect the people, sovereignty, and interests of the United States.

For too long, Washington has pursued open-ended conflicts, unclear objectives, and global commitments that stretch our military, drain our resources, and leave Americans asking what we are actually fighting for.

Strength abroad does not require constant intervention. It requires clarity, discipline, and accountability.

I support a foreign policy that is strong, restrained, and focused on defending America—not managing the world.

What Is Driving the Problem?

Endless and Undefined Commitments

The United States has been involved in conflicts with no clear end state, no defined victory, and no accountability for failure. These engagements cost lives, resources, and public trust.

Lack of Congressional Accountability

Too often, military actions are initiated or expanded without clear authorization from Congress. This bypasses the constitutional role of elected representatives.

Nation-Building and Mission Creep

Military force has been used for objectives far beyond national defense, including long-term nation-building efforts that lack clear success criteria.

Strategic Dependence on Foreign Supply Chains

Global instability is compounded by dependence on foreign manufacturing and critical resources. Economic policy and national security are directly linked.

Why It Matters to Idaho

Idaho has a strong tradition of military service. Our sons and daughters serve with honor, and their sacrifice deserves clear purpose and leadership.

When foreign policy is unclear or mismanaged, it is American service members and their families who bear the cost.

At the same time, global instability affects Idaho through supply chains, energy prices, and economic uncertainty.

Foreign policy is not distant. It directly impacts lives at home.

My Approach

America should be strong enough to defend itself and disciplined enough to avoid unnecessary conflict.

The use of military force must be tied to clear objectives, defined outcomes, and proper constitutional authority.

We should prioritize:

• Defense of the homeland
• Protection of vital national interests
• Strategic deterrence
• Economic independence

Peace is best preserved through strength, clarity, and restraint—not endless engagement.

Policy Priorities

Restore Congressional Authority Over War

The decision to engage in military conflict must go through Congress. I will support efforts to enforce and reclaim this constitutional responsibility.

End Open-Ended Military Commitments

Military engagements must have clear objectives, defined timelines, and measurable outcomes. I oppose indefinite deployments without a clear mission.

Strengthen National Defense and Deterrence

A strong, well-equipped military deters conflict and protects American interests. Readiness and capability must remain a priority.

Reduce Strategic Dependence

National security requires resilient domestic supply chains. I support policies that reduce reliance on adversarial nations for critical goods and resources.

Prioritize American Interests

Foreign policy should serve the American people first. Alliances and agreements must be evaluated based on whether they strengthen national security and sovereignty.

Day One Priorities

In the Senate, I will support legislation and oversight to:

• Reassert Congress’s authority in authorizing military force
• Review and reassess ongoing military commitments
• Strengthen oversight of defense spending and operations
• Support policies that bring critical supply chains back to the United States
• Ensure clear objectives and accountability in any military engagement

Bottom Line

America does not need to fight every conflict to remain strong.

We need a foreign policy that is disciplined, accountable, and focused on defending our people and our interests.

Strength without restraint leads to endless war.

Restraint without strength invites conflict.

We must have both.